adopted from Rushworth Kidder

I. Recognize that there is a moral issue, determine the actors, and gather the relevant facts
II. Test for right vs. wrong issues – these are easier than III. because there is usually a more obvious (right) answer
- Stench test (rules-based) – Does one option just sound wrong or leave you feeling like you are breaking a rule?
- Front Page test (ends-based) – Are you OK with the decision you made being on all major news websites?
- Mom test (care-based) – Will your mother (and/or father) approve of the decision you made?
III. Test for right vs. right paradigms – these are decisions where two competing, an often equally valid, views are held. Integrate the “The Genius of the And”, not “The Tyranny of the Or” in finding solutions.
- Justice vs. Mercy
- Example – Death vs. Life Sentence
- Freedom vs. Responsibility
- Example – Free to carry gun, use pot, but don’t hurt others
- Truth vs. Loyalty
- Example – Lies used to save lives in WWII Germany
- Freedom vs. Responsibility
- Example – Free to carry gun, use pot, but don’t hurt others
- Continuity vs. Change
- Example – Stick to Constitution, or adapt to current times
- Short-term vs. Long-term
- Example – Drive fast – on time vs. drive safe – live longer
- Individuals vs. Community
- Example – Lower taxes vs. better schools, roads, etc.
IV. Apply the 3 forms of resolving dilemmas to the decision and identify the line of reasoning that seems most relevant and persuasive to the issue
- Ends-based thinking – Utilitarianism – Seek the Greatest Good for the Greatest Number
- Example – Drop the atomic bomb on Japan because hundreds of thousands more will die if don’t?
- Rules-based thinking – Universalizability – Follow the Principle We Want Everyone Else to Follow
- Example – Is it ever OK to help someone die? Can you steal medicine to save a life?
- Care-based thinking – Reversibility or Golden Rule – Do to Others What We Would Like Them to Do to Us
- Example – Do non-violent offenders need to be in prison for long sentences?
V. Make the decision, then Revisit and Reflect on the Decision